Anchorage, AK, September 23, 2026 — Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan has declined an emergency appeal concerning a dispute over a pregnancy involving a surrogate mother and biological parents. The appeal was brought by a surrogate mother residing in Alaska, who reportedly refused to terminate a pregnancy after the fetus was diagnosed with a serious heart defect. This decision was contrary to the wishes of the biological parents, identified as a couple from Los Angeles.

Justice Kagan’s refusal to grant the emergency appeal effectively upholds a prior ruling by a California court. This California court order had granted parental authority over the child to the biological parents.

The child at the center of the legal dispute was born in Texas. The specific details regarding the nature of the serious heart defect, the exact timeline of the legal proceedings, or the names of the individuals involved were not immediately available. Similarly, the specific grounds for the surrogate mother’s appeal to the Supreme Court were not detailed in the information provided.

The case highlights complex legal and ethical considerations surrounding surrogacy, particularly when disagreements arise between intended parents and surrogates regarding medical decisions during pregnancy. The California court’s decision, now affirmed by Justice Kagan’s procedural action, centers on granting parental rights to the biological parents.

Further details regarding the specific California court order and the legal arguments presented by both parties were not disclosed. The outcome means the biological parents retain legal authority as established by the California court.


Story summarized from the original created by Julian Mark, Praveena Somasundaram, Justin Jouvenal, The Washington Post on www.adn.com, see more information here.

Media gallery

About The Author